From Individual Wins to Collective ROI: The Great Divide
A major paradox currently shapes how organizations capture value from AI:
- At the individual level, especially within technical teams, productivity gains are massive: they typically range from 2 times to 3 times, and can skyrocket up to 8 times for specific tasks.
- At the collective level (across the entire company), this gain gets diluted, averaging out to about 30%.
This gap exists because the pace of technological evolution has outrun the adaptability of corporate structures. Simply plugging AI into an existing organization without changing workflows is no longer enough. Even if a call center or back office mechanically boosts its processing capacity, a localized operational ROI does not automatically translate into enterprise-wide financial value.
For large corporations, the challenge is to move past simple cost-cutting and chase incremental revenue. Conversely, scale-ups experience a much more immediate dynamic. These agile structures leverage AI to automate customer relations, allowing them to fuel growth without a proportional increase in sales headcount, thereby capturing early economies of scale.
The Silicon Valley Wake-Up Call: From “Token Maxing” to the “Harness” Era
The current AI market dynamic revolves around two major economic realities:
1. The Rebound Effect of Inference Costs
For equivalent performance, the price per token has plummeted roughly 200 times over the last 18 months. However, this historic drop in costs has triggered a geometric explosion in volume. User queries are denser, user bases are expanding, and the rollout of agentic architectures is multiplying IT infrastructure consumption.
2. The Mandate for Control (The Harness)
Companies are moving away from a “token maxing” mindset and entering the era of strict budgetary control and governance (the harness).
The operational risks of operating without guardrails are real. Vincent Luciani points to a client that racked up an unexpected $150,000 bill after leaving an autonomous agent running in an unsupervised loop overnight. To prevent these financial slip-ups, implementing rigorous governance is mandatory: companies must evaluate model reliability, track technical drift over time, monitor infrastructure costs, and carefully map out access rights.
Reconfiguring Jobs: The Healthcare Example
Fears of mass layoffs due to automation are often countered by historical perspective. Past technological revolutions generated productivity gains that boosted corporate competitiveness, fueled growth, and ultimately stimulated employment. On the ground, direct job replacement remains rare; the real shift is in the nature of the tasks themselves.
The medical sector perfectly illustrates this augmentation dynamic. In both hospitals and private practices, the administrative coding of tens of thousands of post-consultation procedures is incredibly time-consuming. Automating these processes allows a doctor to save several hours a day.
This recovered time is redirected toward human interaction and the clinical analysis of symptoms. The boundary for delegation is crystal clear here:
“Sensitive, personal, or emotional requests must be handled by a human being, because you need to meet emotion with emotion.”, Vincent Luciani, Co-founder and Executive Chairman of Artefact
This value-enhancement principle is also evident in tech roles: the number of active developers and radiologists has never been higher than since AI was integrated into their workflows.
Horizontal vs. Vertical: Mapping the Value
When it comes to managing and extracting value from enterprise data, building a sustainable competitive advantage happens across two distinct dimensions:
- Horizontal AI (Interface Optimization): Until now, software intelligence was confined to functional silos (sales in the CRM, marketing in dedicated tools, finance in the ERP). The value now lies in horizontally interconnecting these systems to unify data flows.
- Vertical AI (Industry Expertise): The most differentiating innovations are found in sector-specific specialization. This is the exact segment where the European ecosystem can build a competitive edge, as these solutions escape the simple laws of economies of scale native to generic models.
Ultimately, the viability of corporate strategies in the AI era does not depend on technologically aligning behind third-party models. Instead, it relies on executive leadership’s ability to verticalize their proprietary business data while structuring a rigorous control framework for their costs and decisions.
Watch the podcast on Youtube (French)
