Artefact Value By Data

When a property firm needs a Chief AI Officer

In many property firms, AI adoption has started with a pilot, a few licences and a promise to come back to the board with a plan. Turning that activity into a lasting change in how people work is proving harder. The difficulty extends beyond property: JLL’s global 2026 Future of Work research found that 42% of companies had moved beyond their initial pilots, but only 15% had progressed with AI-driven organisational change. Closing that gap requires someone with the time, authority and budget to change how the firm works. For some UK property businesses, that should be a Chief AI Officer (CAIO). My view is that most can assign the responsibility elsewhere.

AI ROI: How CFOs can approve with discipline, from pilot to scale

Every company that approves budget for artificial intelligence runs the same risk: celebrating a technically flawless pilot that does not move a single line of the P&L. The problem is not approving too much. It is measuring the wrong thing: usage, accuracy and adoption instead of financial results.

When AI Recommends Your Bank: The GEO Revolution

Online brand visibility is shifting from clicks to AI recommendations in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. In this study with VizibAI, Artefact introduces Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the banking sector, offering a concrete framework to measure, analyze, and influence how AI represents your brand.

Europe, China, US: Three different AI races on the same track

The International Federation of Robotics counted 542,000 industrial robot installations worldwide in 2024. China took 295,000 of them, more than half. Europe installed about 85,000, and the United States 34,200. The country whose frontier models usually sit at the top of the benchmarks performs last.

Foundation models: When they become a commodity, where will enterprise competitive advantage come from?

If every company can access AI of comparable capability, what will differentiate tomorrow’s market leaders? The answer lies not in the model itself, but in the organizational context built on top of it. Organizational context encompasses the business knowledge, operating processes, decision-making rules, domain expertise, and best practices accumulated over years of running a business. It determines whether AI can truly understand how an enterprise operates, support business objectives, and continuously learn from every interaction to develop capabilities unique to that organization.

Breaking through the AI transformation bottleneck: Rebuilding organizational capabilities

Enterprise investment in AI is reaching unprecedented levels, yet only a minority of organizations are successfully translating that investment into value at scale. The gap is not primarily about technology. It is about whether an organization has the capabilities to harness AI, redesign its business, and continuously create value. AI transformation is fundamentally a transformation of organizational capabilities: enabling employees to use AI effectively, equipping teams to design and manage AI systems, and building the mechanisms that allow the organization to continuously absorb and evolve with AI capabilities.

Why GEO in China is different from the West

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is becoming a new priority for brands seeking visibility in AI-powered search. But in China, simply importing a Western GEO playbook may not be enough. China’s search landscape has evolved from Baidu-led search to a fragmented ecosystem of Super Apps, platform-native discovery, and AI assistants. As a result, brands face a fundamentally different environment for being discovered, surfaced, and trusted by AI.

China AI transformation: Slow and steady wins the race

AI is advancing at unprecedented speed, and the pressure to keep up is everywhere. Companies are racing to adopt the latest tools, benchmark against competitors, and capture quick efficiency gains. But in the rush to move faster, are they asking the right questions?

Go to Top