Artefact Value By Data

Part 3 – The operating model: Forward deployed teams in the building

In Part 1, we showed how enterprise AI stalls at 14% adoption when bought like SaaS. In Part 2, we mapped the four capabilities of the Deployment Layer (Deploy, Ground, Adopt, Build) and demonstrated why grounding must precede training. In Part 3, we present the operational structure required to make it stick: embedded squads pairing strategists and engineers, the chaos that emerges without them, and the real-world proof from Chancerygate.

Part 2 – The blueprint: Deploy, ground, adopt, build

In Part 1, we explored why enterprise AI rollouts stall at a 14% adoption rate when treated like standard software procurement. Frontier AI value lives in the distance between the model and company data. In Part 2, we map out the four structural components of the Deployment Layer: Deploy (governance), Ground (MCP & business rules), Adopt (training on live data), and Build (production agents). We demonstrate through the case of Bora Brasil why grounding must always precede training.

Part 1 – The 14% trap: Why enterprise AI stalls after the licence is signed

When enterprises roll out frontier AI models like Claude or ChatGPT, weekly active usage routinely stalls at around 14%, devolving into basic email rewriting while high-friction manual work remains untouched. Treating frontier AI like traditional SaaS procurement fails because the value does not live inside the model—it lives in the distance between the model and the company’s internal data, permissions, and daily workflows. Value is governed by a simple arithmetic: Value=Model x Deployment x Layer. Without closing that distance, a company does not have an AI capability; it only has a subscription.

A Three-Layer Framework for Smarter Cities

The sensors work, the dashboards are live and still the city cannot answer a simple question. The cities that stall are not short on technology, they are short on shared meaning and the gap carries a cost that compounds.

Architectural Blueprint: Implementing an Enterprise Intelligence Layer for Conversational AI Pipelines

Scaling conversational AI past initial pilots requires more than probabilistic retrieval—it demands governed business context. In this architectural blueprint, discover how Artefact and Starburst build an Enterprise Intelligence Layer that federates disparate data systems into certified, AI-ready data products. By separating raw data retrieval from business logic, this framework establishes a deterministic, auditable control plane that ensures conversational agents deliver accurate, traceable, and legally compliant outputs.

Why agentic marketing projects stall at the first agent

A collection of isolated AI agents will not transform marketing operations. Discover why true agentic marketing requires connected decisions, persistent memory across cycles, and marketer-governed business rules to unlock hyper-personalization at scale.

We’re fixing the workflow, not the margin

Most insurers have pointed their AI programmes at the expense ratio. I suggest they should be focussed at the loss ratio. Two conversations in the last fortnight got me here. On 17 September I hosted a breakfast roundtable in London on the disruption of AI in underwriting and claims, with COOs, Heads of Customer Journey, Heads of Data and AI transformation leads from several of the biggest UK insurers and brokers. Last week I was on an INSEAD insurance panel and a completely different group brought me to a similar conclusion...

Go to Top